Excavations at Valshni Village, Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dating |
|
Valshni Village, as noted previously, would not have the proper wood available for dendrochronology. Dating had to be based on stratigraphic studies and the occurrence of intrusive trade items.
The results of the stratitests in the four main mounds were disappointing. The material within a mound was relatively homogeneous; the principal differences occurred between mounds. A relative, floating chronology valid for Valshni Village could have been developed from internal evidence on the site, however, the only potential for assigning calendrical dates proved to be the intrusive Hohokam Red-on-buff ware, intrusive from the Gila Basin. The dating of the Hohokam series was worked out in detail by Gila Pueblo of Globe, Arizona (Gladwin and others, 1937). The dates were based on the association of intrusive Mogollon and Anasazi types, types which have been dated by dendrochronology. The dates determined for the different phases of the Hohokam sequence are being strengthened at every excavation where Hohokam material has been intruded into tree ring datable associations. [Ed. Note: Gladwin had several changes of heart with the original set of dates (Gladwin, 1942, and 1948). DiPeso (1956), Wheat (1955), and Bullard (1962) also have suggested chronological schemes for the Hohokam. There can, however, be little doubt regarding the accuracy of the dates for the Gila Butte, Santa Cruz, Sacaton, and Soho Phases suggested in the original Snaketown report (Gladwin and others, 1937). These are the critical phases for the dating of Valshni Village.]
The dating problem at Valshni Village is a double problem. First, there is the dating of the two defined phases of the indigenous culture, the Vamori and Topawa Phases. Secondly, the Trincheras series potteries, not dated in the past, were present in sufficient quantities and in a context where some feeling can be gained of their age. The ceramic associations are given by phase in Table 2.
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Pottery associations by Phase
|
Phase
|
Pottery
|
Types
|
| Sells |
Indigenous |
Sells Plain Sells Red Tanque Verde Red-on-brown |
|
Intrusive |
Casa Grande Red-on-buff Gila Polychrome |
| Topawa |
Indigenous |
Sells Plain Valshni Red Topawa Red-on-brown |
|
Intrusive |
Casa Grande Red-on-buff Sacaton Red-on-buff Trincheras Black-on-red |
| Vamori |
Indigenous |
Sells Plain, Valshni Red Vamori Red-on-brown |
|
Intrusive |
Santa Cruz Red-on-buff Sacaton Red-on-buff Trincheras Black-on-red Trincheras Polychrome Altar Polychrome |
|
Trash mounds 1 and 2 represented the earliest trash deposits found at Valshni Village. Vamori Red-on-brown was the indigenous decorated pottery. The intruded Hohokam pottery was in each case, Santa Cruz Red-on-buff, Sacaton Red-on-buff, and a large body of sherds intermediate in type. The two types were very mixed in the trash. The deposition of mounds 1 and 2 occurred during the time that was transitional between the Santa Cruz and Sacaton Phases in the Gila Basin, which occurred at approximately A.D. 900. Therefore, because of the presence of Santa Cruz Red-on-buff, Sacaton Red-on-buff, and a large body of sherds intermediate between the two types, the beginning of the Vamori Phase is dated at A.D. 800.
Mound 3 contained Vamori Red-on-brown as the indigenous decorated ware. The intrusive Hohokam pottery was almost completely Sacaton Red-on-buff. Mound 4 contained Topawa Red-on-brown as the indigenous type, associated with some Sacaton Red-on-buff and a large amount of Casa Grande Red-on-buff. Based on the strong Vamori Red-on-brown-Sacaton Red-on-brown association in Mound 3 and the strong Topawa Red-on-brown-Casa Grande Red-on-buff association in Mound 4, the terminal point for the Vamori Phase (the initial point for the Topawa Phase) is dated at A.D. 1100. The terminal date for the Topawa Phase (initial date for the Sells Phase) is A.D. 1250. Table 3 sets forth the Papaguerian Phases known at present and their correlatives in the Hohokam Sequence after A.D. 700.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Chronologic correlation of Papaguerian and Gila Basin Phase sequences
|
A.D. Dates
|
|
Papaguerian Sequence
|
|
Hohokam Sequence
|
| 1450 |
|
? |
|
? |
| 1400 |
|
|
|
|
| 1350 |
|
Sells Phase |
|
Civano Phase |
| 1300 |
|
|
|
|
| 1250 |
|
|
|
|
| 1200 |
|
Topawa Phase |
|
Soho Phase |
| 1150 |
|
|
|
|
| 1100 |
|
|
|
|
| 1050 |
|
|
|
|
| 1000 |
|
|
|
Sacaton Phase |
| 950 |
|
Vamori Phase |
|
|
| 900 |
|
|
|
|
| 850 |
|
|
|
|
| 800 |
|
|
|
Santa Cruz Phase |
| 750 |
|
? |
|
|
| 700 |
|
|
|
|
|
A single Black-on-white sherd was associated with the Topawa Phase trash on the western portion of the site. This sherd was identified as either Mesa Verde Black-on-white or a hybrid of Sosi Black-on-white and Dogoszhi Black-on-white (Colton, personal communication). Mesa Verde Black-on-white has been dated as early as A.D. 1200 (Colton and Hargrave, 1937:231), Sosi Black-on-white from about A.D. 1120-1150 (Colton and Hargrave, 1937:211), and Dogoszhi Black-on-white until A.D. 1150 (Colton and Hargrave, 1937:209)., [Ed. Note: Breternitz suggests best dates for indigenous Mesa Verde Black-on-white as "between 1030 and 1284", and as a tradeware "between 1270 and 1340 plus or minus" (1966:85-86). Sosi Black-on-white is best indigenously "between 1095 and 119011, as a tradeware "between 1075 and about 1200", (Breternitz, 1966:96), while Dogoszhi Black-on-white is best indigenously "between 1137 and 1200", and as a tradeware, "between 1085 and 1200" (Breternitz, 1966:73-74).] This sherd tends to confirm the dating of the Topawa Phase.
The second part of the dating problem, that of the Trincheras pottery cannot be handled as readily, but approximate dates can be suggested. It must be stressed, that these dates are for Trincheras materials in sites in which it has occurred intrusively, not in its home area.
Trincheras Purple-on-red, Trincheras Polychrome, and Altar Polychrome were well established by the 10th century A. D. The evidence at Valshni Village gives them a strong Vamori Phase association. The small amount of Trincheras pottery (less than 0.1% of all decorated pottery) at the Gleeson Site (Fulton and Tuthill,1940:48) supports this general period of time for the series, the Gleeson Site dating between approximately A.D. 800 and A.D. 1000. The available data would make it appear that these types developed earlier in the Trincheras area than is found in these two sites.
The two Trincheras Polychromes appeared at Valshni Village only in the early part of the Vamori Phase and in very minor quantities, less than 0.8% of all decorated pottery. These dates would suggest that these two types were dying out or were never made in great quantity. The former would seem to be the more likely as they occur frequently in surface collections from Sonoran sites. Therefore, it is suggested that Trincheras and Altar Polychromes reached their peak development prior to A.D. 800. Since Trincheras Purple-on-red is always associated with the Polychromes in Sonora, the development of this type probably also dates prior to A. D. 800. The Polychromes had apparently ceased to be made by A. D. 1000, although the Purple-on-red may have been produced as late as A.D. 1250.
|
|
|
|